Adriano Dutra Teixeira, a Brazilian economist, sent us this photo from a restaurant. As he translates:

Social Responsibility: 50% discount on meal for clients over 70 or bariatric surgery (stomach reduction).

He adds:

I thought it was hilarious! So I wrote a blog post with a microeconomic approach to the promotion, using price discrimination.

I had to chuckle, in part because were finishing up a podcast about commitment devices, in which Levitt offers some bizarre alternatives to bariatric surgery (which we wrote about here), since it is such a drastic commitment.

Further thoughts:

  • I wonder what proof, if any, the restaurant requires to prove bariatric surgery a doctors note? a receipt? a visual scar? And how will people game the system?
  • Who tends to eat less: the median 70-year-old or the median bariatric patient? And especially: what do they each eat less of? Since the restaurant is offering such a hefty discount, Id  assume its meat or some other high-cost food.
  • I can understand why the restaurant touts its social responsibility for feeding 70-year-olds at a discount, but what is the social responsibility factor of the bariatric discount? On the other hand, I guess you cant just put up a sign that says half off for the people we suspect wont eat very much. (FWIW, Brazil is getting pretty obese.)
  • Does a 70-plus person who also had bariatric surgery eat for free?

 

Similar Posts:

Share